Brussels - The world’s largest technology companies are preparing to spend more than $700 billion on artificial intelligence infrastructure in 2026, marking a 75 percent increase from the previous year and intensifying concerns in Europe over digital independence.
The projected capital expenditure, covering data centres, AI chips, networking equipment and advanced computing systems, exceeds the nominal GDP of several European economies. Analysts describe the surge as the most aggressive infrastructure build-out in modern corporate history.
CapEx, or capital expenditure, reflects long-term investments in physical and technological assets designed to strengthen operational capacity. While not fully expensed in a single year, the scale of this spending signals a decisive pivot toward AI as the dominant force shaping global economic power.
Hyperscalers Raise the Stakes
Amazon leads the 2026 spending race with guidance of roughly $200 billion, followed by Alphabet at $185 billion, Microsoft at $145 billion and Meta at $135 billion. Oracle has also raised its projection to $50 billion.
Elon Musk’s ventures are expanding aggressively as well. Tesla is expected to double its investment to nearly $20 billion, while xAI plans to deploy at least $30 billion for new data centres and compute clusters.
The surge in AI infrastructure demand has directly benefited chipmaker Nvidia, whose hardware dominates high-performance AI systems. Executives estimate that a single gigawatt of data centre capacity can cost between $50 billion and $60 billion, with a substantial portion directed toward AI processors.
Global semiconductor sales are forecast to reach $1 trillion for the first time this year, underlining the magnitude of the shift.
Investor Optimism Meets Rising Debt
Wall Street has responded with a mixture of enthusiasm and caution. While investors recognise the urgency of securing leadership in artificial intelligence, the scale of borrowing required to finance these ambitions has raised concerns.
Morgan Stanley estimates hyperscalers may borrow around $400 billion in 2026, more than double last year’s level, potentially driving US corporate bond issuance to record highs.
Projected AI revenues remain well below current investment levels, placing heavy reliance on long-term monetisation. Analysts warn that rapid technological evolution could shorten hardware lifespans, increasing depreciation risk and operational costs, particularly energy consumption.
Some dissenting voices argue that AI economics may differ significantly from the cloud-computing boom that defined the previous two decades. The question is not whether AI will transform industries, but whether the current pace of spending is sustainable.
Europe’s Capital Gap
For the European Union, the disparity is stark. While US firms mobilise nearly €600 billion in a single year, Europe’s projected sovereign cloud infrastructure spending is estimated at just €10.6 billion for 2026.
Although that figure represents significant year-on-year growth, it remains marginal compared to American investment levels.
Brussels has launched initiatives such as the AI Factories programme and the AI Continent Action Plan to stimulate public-private funding. However, Europe’s approach emphasises regulatory safeguards alongside targeted industrial support.
Critics argue that regulation alone cannot offset the sheer financial firepower of US tech giants. European AI firms face structural challenges, including fragmented capital markets and limited access to large-scale compute infrastructure.
Sovereign Compute and Strategic Resistance
France-based Mistral AI has emerged as one of Europe’s most prominent challengers. After raising €1.7 billion in late 2025, the company announced plans to invest €1 billion in capital expenditure this year, including a €1.2 billion data centre project in Sweden designed to deliver “sovereign compute” under EU data standards.
The facility, expected to open in 2027, aims to reduce reliance on US-owned cloud infrastructure and strengthen Europe’s digital autonomy.
Meanwhile, US companies are offering “localised cloud zones” in European countries, promising data residency. Yet critics contend that these remain dependent on American parent companies, potentially exposing European industries to foreign policy shifts or extraterritorial legal reach.
A Battle of Balance Sheets
The AI race has evolved into a contest defined not only by technological expertise but by balance sheet capacity. American firms are leveraging vast capital resources and debt markets to secure dominance in compute infrastructure.
Europe, by contrast, is pursuing a more cautious path, balancing investment with regulation, industrial policy and sovereignty concerns.
As 2026 unfolds, the outcome remains uncertain. If US spending translates into durable competitive advantages, Europe risks deepening its technological dependence. If, however, the AI investment cycle proves overextended, the strategic landscape could shift.
For now, the scale of American investment leaves little doubt: the global AI contest is accelerating, and Europe must decide whether incremental spending and regulatory frameworks will be sufficient to safeguard its digital sovereignty in a world increasingly shaped by colossal private capital.
